
Two different types of prosthetic aortic valves yielded similar rates of mortality, valve regurgitation, and need for subsequent pacemaker implantation, according to results from the SOLVE-TAVI study presented at Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics (TCT) 2020.
“Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) is developing as standard strategy for symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis at high to immediate and now also low risk,” the authors said in a presentation. “Aortic valve replacement device design led to relevant technical and clinical improvements. There is limited evidence for direct valve comparison in particular for latest-generation valve designs.”
The randomized, 2X2 factorial study included 447 patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis who were randomly assigned to either transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using a balloon-expandable valve (BEV) self-expandable valve (SEV) and also to general anesthesia. The endpoint of interest was a composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, moderate or severe PVL, and permanent pacemaker implantation at 30 days.