
Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) remains a significant cause of angina in patients with no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA), with limited therapeutic options. Building on prior evidence from the double-blind and sham-controlled COSIRA trial, which demonstrated the efficacy of the coronary sinus (CS) reducer in improving angina and quality of life in patients with refractory angina secondary to obstructive CAD, Tryon et al. explored its potential role in CMD.
In this Phase II study, 30 patients with invasively diagnosed CMD and refractory angina (Canadian Cardiovascular Society [CCS] class III-IV) without obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease, despite optimal medical therapy, underwent CS reducer implantation. Microvascular function and clinical outcomes were evaluated at baseline and again at 120 days post-implantation. The primary endpoints were changes in coronary microvascular function, according to coronary flow reserve (CFR) with intracoronary adenosine ≤ 2.5—assessing endothelium-independent CM—and coronary blood flow (CBF) increase of ≤ 50% in response to acetylcholine —assessing endothelium-dependent CMD. Those with severe coronary vasospasm in response to acetylcholine were excluded.
This single-arm study revealed significant improvements in both coronary microvascular function and clinical outcomes with CS reducer implantation. Included patients had a mean age of 54.8 +/- 11 years and 66.7% were women. Device implantation was successful in 30 of 32 patients (94%) with procedural failure in 2 patients due to unsuitable coronary sinus anatomy. Two patients suffered coronary sinus perforation requiring pericardiocentesis, both occurring early in the center’s experience. There were no procedural deaths or myocardial infarctions. Patients with impaired CFR (n=19) exhibited a median increase from 2.1 to 2.7 (p=0.0011), while those with reduced CBF response (n=11) demonstrated a median increase from -11.0% to +11.5% (p=0.042). CCS angina class improved from a median of 4.0 to 2.0 (p<0.001), with 76.7% of patients having at least 1 CCS angina class improvement. Quality of life scores on the Seattle Angina Questionnaire significantly increased across all domains (p<0.006 for all). Curiously, changes in CFR or CBF did not correlate well with changes in symptoms across the study participants, which raises questions about the mechanism of benefit and contributions of a placebo effect, although the data was likely not powered to assess such correlations.