
CardioNerds: The proliferation of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has revolutionized the care of patients with aortic stenosis across the spectrum of surgical risk with strong data for both balloon expandable valves (BEVs) and self-expanding valves (SEVs) compared with surgical AVR. Dr. Puri, what is your balance of BEV vs SEV use and how do you decide which to use for a given patient?
Dr. Rishi Puri: It’s important to adopt a “horses for courses” (the right valve for the right patient) approach for valve choice and implant technique/strategy. This is to optimize lifetime management decisions for patients that are residual life expectancy, anatomy and valve durability-dependent. As a result, my TAVI practice is typically a 50:50 split across the 2 main commercially available balloon and self-expanding THV systems here in the US. SAVR will continue to remain very important, especially for young patients in their 60s, and in those with anatomy where TAVI is likely to be anatomically challenging with suboptimal results.
You are among few TAVR operators who have had the opportunity to use the latest iteration of Medtronic’s SEV platform – the Evolut™ FX TAVR system – as part of a limited market release program. What are the most clinically relevant design innovations of the FX system and what issues are these intended to address?